Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Mark Zuckerberg For Spurs, A Campaign

Why TV Rights Matter: A Response

What La Liga is all about: morbo.

Arron Duckling at our SBNation colleague Barca Blaugranes posted a thought-provoking piece on TV rights in La Liga. Take a gander at it, then come back for my response on behalf of Liga Justa.

First of all, kudos to a big-two supporter for writing on the elephant in the room. The problem with the LFP has been that the Real Madrid and Barcelona bigwigs don't speak with Villarreal owner Fernando Roig and Sevilla owner José María del Nido. A lack of open dialogue has only exacerbated the problem.

And I can only quibble with Arron's first two points. Spanish broadcasters, much like the rest of the country, are broke, and showing Racing Santander in prime time does not get hearts racing. Two counterpoints: (1) teams won't develop a following without coverage; and (2) Monday Night Football does fine showing the small-market Jacksonville Jaguars, for example. But I digress.

I have a bigger beef with the other arguments, so I will address them in turn.

Star-divide

 

The logical fallacy resulting from arguments three and four is somewhat self-evident. Just as Atlético Madrid has not flourished with its additional revenue- aside from a historic Europa League title- improved player management would benefit Real and Barca. Making a mistake on a Zlatan Ibrahimovic or Kaká would have crippled 17 teams in La Liga, but they have barely made a ripple in Barcelona and Madrid. That defies logic.

On the European coefficient, England already has the top spot.  Regardless, both leagues receive 3+1 Champions League spots and 2 Europa League places, so only pride is at stake.  Even La Furia Roja has lost the world #1 ranking, but the impact is cosmetic. Additionally, the EPL is clearly a top-two league- and crushes La Liga in terms of revenue and worldwide popularity- so maybe England deserves the top spot after all.

In contrast, consider the impact: Valencia keeps Juan Mata, Villarreal holds on to Santi Cazorla, Osasuna to Nacho Monreal and Javier Camuñas, and the list goes on. Any drop in the top two's competitiveness, which seems relatively minimal (Cesc Fabregas, among others, took a pay cut, and the prestige is great), would be compensated for by greater depth. Getting every Spanish side into the European knockout rounds would be a start- Getafe and Atlético Madrid missed out in last season's Europa League, while Sevilla missed the Champions League group stage. Only Barca, Real, and Villarreal made it beyond the first knockout round last year: 3 out of 7, or below 50%. The "best league in the world" should do better.

On Arron's point five, Barca and Real may gross hundreds of millions more than their rivals, but they are still buried under a mountain of debt. Valencia is the exception to the rule: a club outside the big-two in significant financial difficulty which is not in administration (or on the brink). Cherry-picking Atlético as a big-spending underachiever and Valencia as badly-managed is intellectually dishonest: what about the other 16 clubs? Additionally, Barca and Real face the same problems, but with the cooperation of regional governments and financial institutions, along with a huge revenue disparity, they are able to look past them.

Here is the reality, as I see it:

  • La Liga makes less from its national TV contract than Ligue 1. That must change.
  • Every team other than the big two has a regional fan base. That is a distinctly Spanish phenomenon, due to the nature of regionalism, but the problem won't be fixed by only promoting those two ad nauseam. Take the four writers on our site: Villarreal fans in Baltimore, Boston, DC, and Seattle. Displaying an attractive style of football on a big stage has long-term benefits. And that's after my two favorite players- Juan Román Riquelme and Diego Forlán- have departed El Madrigal.
  • The upcoming modifications to the TV deal are a step in the right direction. But the big two is ensuring its own demise by not conceding further. La Liga once was unique: great top-end talent and depth throughout the top half. We are losing that combination.

Also, Villarreal did make the Champions League semifinals not long ago. It was the same year Barca started on this historic run. Then we beat out Barcelona to finish second in La Liga and survived an injury-ravaged campaign to reach the Champions League quarterfinals. Just last year, we finished fourth in La Liga and reached the Europa League semifinals.

But Villarreal is no longer on the same playing field as Real and Barca. The center cannot hold. This hegemony is a recent phenomenon, and it is killing La Liga. It's time for a change.

Comment 70 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good response

I must say that I am not against the change, but rather think of myself as a realist in saying it will not change. While the other clubs are not as poorly managed, many are buried under such vast debt (considering their poor turnover) that the TV deal would just pay off the debt.

I know you guys posted an article on this before, and used the same guys as a source, but this picture from Monchismen is a good one:

You take the EPL deal exactly how it is, and you take away £50-100 million. That would mean no more Ronaldo for RM, and no more (insert world class player here) for Barca. It would mean similar deals for Valencia and Atletico, and the other clubs would stand to receive between £25-50 million more. That would benefit them hugely, and would get them new players, and pay bills etc, but would not allow them to compete with the ridiculous squads Barca and Real have.

I would argue that Valencia always have to sell their best players, as their £300+ million debt would still exist, and their current deal (£40 million) would not be improved by a large enough amount.

Also I confess that I know far less on this than you, but could Cazorla have moved for money? Presumably Malaga would pay more, and with the CL ambitions, it was too good to turn down.

And as for earning less than Ligue Un, that may appear bad, but France are more economically stable as a whole than spain, and that could explain it.

I would like a new deal, but I feel Real and Barca hold too much power for it to materialise. Of course that could change, but the threat of Barca and Real walking away to form a Super league is more worrying for Spain than if Sevilla lead a walk-out.

I feel you guys should stay friends with RM and FCB for now, and attempt to join any Super league that is created. That would have a larger TV deal, though threatening change now could alienate you guys from such a deal.

Hopefully I am wrong, but I will never be fully in favour of something that will affect my team, as you guys will understand.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 8:03 PM CEST reply actions  

Seconded.

I want what’s best for my club (and country) in the long term; the rejection of a new system is near-sighted because it overlooks the possibility (likelihood) that the whole system will come crumbling down in a few years.

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 9:32 PM CEST up reply actions  

I am a supporter of FC Barcelona

Not the 20 team La Liga

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 9:50 PM CEST up reply actions  

The problem IMO is what happens to Barca if the league continues to lag behind others

Barca and Real have enviable TV contracts right now, but if the EPL is putting out a better overall product they are going to increase revenue while La Liga contracts just don’t. Barca and Real are always going to have a financial edge on the rest of the league…sharing the wealth to add some parity would go a long way towards making the league more watchable. I can only speak for myself here, but I never watch Barca or Real domestic games anymore with the exceptions of when they play each other. As a neutral fan I want to see a game that has a chance for either team to win, and I just don’t get that with La Liga anymore. That’s probably why it’s so hard to find mainstream coverage in the US for La Liga. It’s literally easier at this point to follow Fulham on a weekly basis than it is to follow Barca. When the next round of TV contracts are negotiated, that’s going to be reflected without a doubt.

by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 6, 2011 9:58 PM CEST up reply actions  

I agree with you

But in England, I can watch Barca and Real every week, even the Copa del Rey matches. I cannot watch Chelsea week in week out, or Manchester United, or any team. That would go down the drain if there was a collective deal, hence my hesitance to this deal.

Its ludicrous that I can follow Barcelona with ease, yet struggle to see any EPL team, in England, but the TV deal does that.

I think all the teams need better marketing, I will watch Villarreal, but many don’t know what they have in their team (ie the “sexy” football). It hinders them more than the deal.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 10:03 PM CEST up reply actions  

Agreed

But Barca and Real will penetrate these markets, and the change of Kickoff times in La Liga was geared to have it compete with the EPL. Bottom line is, FC Barcelona and Real Madrid CF are run by businessmen. They know what to do, when to do it, and why they need to do it. That will never change.

La Liga will never compete with La Liga as it is run by morons. They have the best product, but market it as second-rate. They will not compete with England domestically, but in Europe, both at club and international level, will always beat England.

They have two world-class teams, and a national side that benefits from the emphasis on youth. If other teams get the money, I believe La Liga will go the way of the EPL in signing foreign players. As an American, this may not be at the forefront of your mind, but the EPL is killing England’s national team.

The Spanish FA may have this is mind with regards to a new TV deal.

I see the pros of a new deal, but I want to make sure people see the cons.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 11:10 PM CEST up reply actions  

The EPL is killing the English National team??

..what proof do you have of that? Are you saying that the Spanish Football Association should go back to it’s “No Foreign Player rule” from the 50’s? Talk about taking a giant step backwards.

by Timm Higgins on Sep 6, 2011 11:15 PM CEST up reply actions  

I think that's more MSM talk than anything

England’s national team really isn’t doing poorly at all. With the exception of Euro 2008, I don’t think there’s been a tournament since 1994 where I’d really say they massively underachieved. The fact of the matter is that the name recognition worldwide of many English players makes the media overrate them pretty immensely. They haven’t had such a dominant group of players that they should have been shoe-ins to win every game once they reached the knockout phases.

by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 6, 2011 11:21 PM CEST up reply actions  

In my opinion, they are

though being Enlglsh I may be biased…come on guys, just my opinion. I’m not saying they should win, but before the 00s and the influx of players, they were getting closer, see Euro 96.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 7, 2011 9:12 AM CEST up reply actions  

Euro 96

Where they were at home, did not deserve to beat Spain and then got beaten by the Germans.
Did the Prem kill England in 1994? What about 1998 or 2002?
England are a second-tier European side. THat’s not because the Premier League is killing the development of the players, it’s because the players aren’t good enough, hence why International players are brought in.

AAARRRRRRRSSSSSHHHHHHHHAAAAAAVVVVVIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNN!
Dream goal!

by Aidan Gibson on Sep 8, 2011 12:51 PM CEST up reply actions  

So as long as FC Barcelona is fine..

…you don’t care if the league they play in goes down the crapper?

by Timm Higgins on Sep 6, 2011 10:41 PM CEST up reply actions  

Twisting my words

I do care about La Liga, but do my words have an effect? Of course not, my words are merely my thoughts on the issue, as it is not just as simple as renegotiating. I do not want my team to lose £100 million every season, and at the moment, the obvious lack of depth in la liga is arguably benefiting Barcelona in Europe.

If a deal comes along fine, until then, i will not bleat on about how unfair it is, as I have no real clue why it has not been addressed.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 10:51 PM CEST up reply actions  

So you'd rather just stick your head in the sand..

..and not try and educate the people who might not know? You have a powerful tool and voice as we all do here at SBN. Why not do some good with that voice and at the least educate people? But hey if that’s not your bag, I guess that’s fine then.

by Timm Higgins on Sep 6, 2011 11:12 PM CEST up reply actions   1 recs

Attack me then....

Do you know why it has not been addressed? Do you have direct links to the Spanish FA? Do you have reasons from the TV companies? What I say is likely to be false. I could educate how unfair it is, but most of our readers know about it, and I am not in the business of treating them like idiots.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 7, 2011 9:14 AM CEST up reply actions  

I sympathize with your sentiments

But people will stop watching blowouts. It’s just the natural order of sports fans.

The debt discussion is on point. Villarreal’s is to the owner, so it’s not quite the same as most other clubs. And the capital project will hopefully erase much of that.

And no thanks on a super league. We’ll never make it anyhow. You have to stick to your identity.

Endavant, a triomfar, a guanyar Villarreal!

by siempre_riquelme on Sep 6, 2011 9:55 PM CEST up reply actions  

But the threats....

The threats of a walk-out on Barca and Real will hasten their exit to form such a league, and no-one will pay top $ to watch La Liga without Barca and Real.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 10:05 PM CEST up reply actions  

If the Super League happens

Barca and Real are gone anyways. I don’t know if push will come to shove, but I don’t think it will hurt anyone monetarily to threaten the big two. In other ways, though…

Endavant, a triomfar, a guanyar Villarreal!

by siempre_riquelme on Sep 6, 2011 10:11 PM CEST up reply actions  

The thing is, Barca and Real likely both lose in the super league as well

They would certainly make more money from the combined La Liga and Champions League contracts than they would from a Super League that would almost certainly divide the revenue far more equally.

by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 6, 2011 10:37 PM CEST up reply actions  

depends whos in it

It would replace the UCL theoretically. This is good talk, but ultimately, we have no clue about any of this. A Super League may never come to fruition

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 10:52 PM CEST up reply actions  

and you know, it's not as if Madrid and Barcelona would suffer that much!!

they would get a smaller share, yes, but of an increased pie.
Oh, but they might have to work harder to finish in the top two. I get it.

couple of comments:

Cazorla: at least from everything said by everyone at the time, while Cazorla certainly benefited financially from the move, he did not request to move. The deal was done because Villarreal felt they had to sell a player for big money in order to be financially responsible.

Ligue Un: as I recall the real reason for the disparity is that the French league has two contracts with different TV companies, one covering a ‘match of the week’ sort of thing. But I am only half-remembering this, so perhaps someone can put me straight. I do recall they have no “free” TV match.

I would hope the superleague talk is only talk, but while Villarreal deserves a spot in such a league through their results it doesn’t fit with the team’s ethos. And we certainly could not compete with other teams in such a league on matchday revenues—we don’t have that large a catchment area and I can’t see us building a 60,000-seat El Madrigal to attract fans from elsewhere in Spain for a few games a year, even if we could afford it.

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 6, 2011 9:26 PM CEST reply actions  

On Cazorla

http://www.elpais.com/articulo/deportes/balon/sufrimos/mucho/elpepidep/20110906elpepidep_5/Tes?
P. ¿Cómo le convencieron de abandonar al Villarreal? ¿Con dinero?

R. No. Con un proyecto. Pero yo no tenía pensado marcharme hasta que el Villarreal me dijo que necesitaba dinero y que me tenía que ir. De ir al Málaga me convencieron Antonio Fernández [director deportivo] y, claro, Pellegrini, que desde el principio expresó su deseo de que me fuera con él. La necesidad era del Villareal antes que mía. Fueron muy sinceros. Ellos me comunicaron su necesidad, llegó el Málaga y la oferta les pareció importante.

Endavant, a triomfar, a guanyar Villarreal!

by siempre_riquelme on Sep 6, 2011 9:41 PM CEST up reply actions  

In English

No plans to go until Villarreal told him they needed money and he had to leave. The interest was the club’s and not his.

Endavant, a triomfar, a guanyar Villarreal!

by siempre_riquelme on Sep 6, 2011 9:51 PM CEST up reply actions  

thanks for clearing that up guys

With the Manchester City comparisons, I don’t know how similar they are.

However, this proves it was a case of money.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 9:52 PM CEST up reply actions  

No mention of our article on the subject?!?!

I’M SO ANGRY! (Just kidding dudes, GREAT work here, seriously).

If you’d like, Lucas wrote a little jaunt on the subject a couple days ago.

Great work, again, I’m a huge fan of your site :-)

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 9:28 PM CEST reply actions   1 recs

Great article.

Many of the arguments are close to those I wrote in my article about this

Hasta el final, vamos Real.

by Lucas Navarrete on Sep 6, 2011 9:45 PM CEST reply actions  

Thanks.

I just read yours. Good to hear some sanity from your side as well. It’s like discrimination: until the people who benefit speak up, nothing will happen.

Endavant, a triomfar, a guanyar Villarreal!

by siempre_riquelme on Sep 6, 2011 9:49 PM CEST up reply actions  

That's exactly why I wrote this piece today:
It’s important for us to understand what’s going on so we can try to do something to help fix the problem: as fans, we hold the power in our own hands. The first task is to understand what’s really happening (we’ve covered la Liga’s financial problems in depth on this site), and to recognize our club’s role in it. The second step is to act, to tell the club that we’re fed up with the way things are—because, in the end, no one wants to watch a league that comes down to two matches. That’s why you see the “Liga Justa” emblem on the left side of this site—and I truly believe in this cause, no matter how hypocritical I sound.

Here’s the full text, but needless to say Managing Madrid is 100% behind this effort.

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 9:52 PM CEST up reply actions  

This 1st bit is for the MM guys

I support the claims, but only to an extent, if you are 100% behind it, why are you not boycotting Real? It appears as though you accept your teams part, though despite the talk, are not going to act on it. I know Barca are responsible too, but I will not say that this TV deal will sort it all.

Add on another £100 million to every other La Liga club, and they do not even get close to Barca and Real in terms of revenue. The £100 million would help, but ultimately, it needs to be invested properly, and track record IMO says it will not be by every club. Bilbao compete, and they compete with less money and the Basque restrictions. It is also about style of play.

While Barcelona beat Villarreal 5-0, that was not a “real” result. Last season it was close, and I thoroughly believe that this season’s result was a freak event, down to the poor gameplan. The league does not have as big a gulf as the 5-0 suggests.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 9:59 PM CEST reply actions  

Same as the debt point

I agree with the global argument, but the league should step in. If you allow a team like Levante to have 5 million in additional money over the next 20 years, that allows them to make a big (for them) transfer every season. And that’s easily enough to determine if they stay up or not.

A lot has to do with management, but the big two, Atletico, and Valencia are no good at it. Doesn’t mean other clubs can’t be. And then you have to actually punish administration, not paying player wages, and the like.

This is but one step, albeit a big one, in the entire process. It took years to get into this situation, and it won’t be solved overnight.

Endavant, a triomfar, a guanyar Villarreal!

by siempre_riquelme on Sep 6, 2011 10:03 PM CEST up reply actions  

Nail on the head

Forgot to mention that, glad you did. The EPL strictly punishes administration, why doesn’t La Liga? These points deductions would give the management the kick up the ass they need to get better.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 10:06 PM CEST up reply actions  

It's a rare thing for top level clubs in England to enter administration, so the punishment can be extremely harsh

There’s been one Premier League club and an additional 4 Championship clubs all time to enter into the process. La Liga could have as many as 22 clubs in the top two divisions in administration come the end of this season…it’s hard to punish clubs as strictly when the majority are in the same boat.

by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 6, 2011 10:29 PM CEST up reply actions  

Though do you think...

Does it have more to do with the fragile state of Spain as a country? England is economically stable(ish) at least more so than Spain, and this cannot be underestimated

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 11:03 PM CEST up reply actions  

I don't think that's it at all

I really think it comes down to the distribution of wealth to the smaller clubs. The minnows have the ability to deal with losses because the other minnows can afford to buy players. If a club starts to get into trouble, they can always find other smaller clubs who can pay them a decent amount for their players and help them right the ship (even if it means demotion). That’s just not the case in Spain, as teams outside of the top 4 don’t make as much as the three clubs relegated in England do.

by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 6, 2011 11:10 PM CEST up reply actions  

But there is no money to give them!

I sound like a broken record, but where are Sogecable ggoing to get the extra £500 million to make this a fair league? Where are Mediapro going to find the £250 million to just pay their current contracts? Many English clubs are running up a debt, but it is manageable. Spanish clubs cannot get loans like English clubs can

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 7, 2011 9:16 AM CEST up reply actions  

Implementing strict policies to prevent teams from going into administration

Will only work if they are truly preventative and not just reactive. Punishing Valencia and Atleti now is like retroactively punishing people who lost their money in the housing bubble—you’re just screwing over the poor for doing what the system compelled them to do.

This whole argument is very reminiscent of the “they’re poor because they’re not trying hard enough” fallacy: it’s forgetting that there’s a whole set of social and structural reasons why these things happen. Just like taking money away from underperforming schools is basically just taking funding away from the places that need it most, punishing the teams in administration would only force them farther and farther into the tank, and create a vicious cycle.

We need a better solution than that: a revenue sharing system, a new revenue distribution, and then when everyone is back to square one (at least in terms of debt), then you can talk about penalties for clubs who fall into administration.

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 10:29 PM CEST up reply actions  

But forcing them to not rely on TV money is a good lesson

Atleti could pay their players, as could Valencia, we are on about Zaragoza and Hercules etc.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 11:04 PM CEST up reply actions  

Well, I feel very strongly that you can support the team as a team, yet not support some of what the team as an organization does

I can root for Real Madrid as a team, yet be opposed to Real Madrid’s financial policies. Here’s an analogous situation: I can love and support my country, but be opposed to its actions. Just because you disagree with a small part of what the organization does doesn’t mean you have to stop supporting the organization—that’s a part/whole fallacy.

So, I can call for people to understand what Real Madrid (and Barcelona) are doing wrong, while simultaneously hoping that Madrid wins their matches. I see no problem with that.

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 10:22 PM CEST up reply actions   1 recs

The "action" in this case is writing pieces to try to spread the knowledge of what's going on

A “boycott” implies a complete rejection of the entire entity that is Real Madrid. I see no reason to do that; I see a reason to educate the fanbase about the unfortunate situation that Real Madrid is helping to create, and to pressure the club to change.

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 10:33 PM CEST up reply actions   1 recs

What better way to pressure the club than boycotting?

If every Barca/RM fan walked out, did not attend matches etc, the problem would be dealt with quicker surely?

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 10:55 PM CEST up reply actions  

Because, again "boycotting" implies that I disagree with everything the club does generally

If, instead, I, for example, circle a RM-fan petition that expresses our desire as Madrid fans to change the system, then I won’t be rejecting the team itself, but rather the way the team is doing business. For example: I wouldn’t boycott my country; but I would organize to protest a particular piece of legislation, for example.

It’s a bit of a straw-man to keep suggesting that Madrid/Barça fans that are unhappy with their teams’ actions in the financial crisis boycott them: there’s no need for such action, because it suggests that we’re no longer fans, or that the only way to support our cause is to no longer be fans.

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 11:47 PM CEST up reply actions  

It's not the only way

But would you agree that if everyone decided not to show up to the next home game, as a show of unity with the other clubs, that something would not come up sooner? I am not telling you to boycott, or that you have to stop supporting RM, but I believe that action can be taken to sort this out, and it is not articles.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 7, 2011 9:17 AM CEST up reply actions  

I have kinda painted myself as the villain here...

I like La Liga, do not want it to go down the drain, but with all the will, and angry articles, in the world, Barca and Real will not budge as it suits them.

By all means, we can address this, but the point remains, an extra £100 million for each club will still not get them close. Barcelona’s success is built off an academy. That is supplemented by huge signings, made possible by TV revenue, but they pay themselves off with merchandise. At the end of the day you must accept this:

Real and Barca are to of the best squads in the world, and perhaps of all-time. They have two all-time great players in Messi and Ronaldo, and two of the best ever coaches in Guardiola and Mourinho.

That has more to do with it than £140 million TV contracts IMO.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 6, 2011 11:00 PM CEST reply actions  

You keep suggesting...

and extra £100 per team – this conversation is not about achieving absolute parity in revenue – rather, that the issue be dealt with equitably.

villarrealusa.com - Endavant Villarreal!

by maddi on Sep 6, 2011 11:30 PM CEST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Absolute parity in revenue is a) unreasonable b) naive and c) wouldn’t be fun anyways.

Editor-in-Chief of Managing Madrid
@GabeLezra

by Gabe Lezra on Sep 6, 2011 11:49 PM CEST up reply actions  

Yeah parity in revenue is damn impossible..

…there are other ways to do the parity..but I don’t see La Liga, Barca or Real Madrid agreeing to a MLS type structure which is a single entity business.

by Timm Higgins on Sep 7, 2011 12:00 AM CEST up reply actions  

alright then

A TV contract with more parity will aid the clubs a little bit, but you know what? I will still bet on RM to decimate any of the bottom clubs. The problem may be TV revenue, but it is not a magic fix-all. Even a better TV deal will not create 20 points for Valencia, or take 20 away from Barca and Real.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 7, 2011 9:20 AM CEST up reply actions  

Even Sr. Roig says the EPL model has too much parity

so I don’t think it is about achieving parity with anyone. it is about sharing the revenue in such a way that responsibly managed clubs have an opportunity to succeed on and off the pitch.

Tell me, how are teams like Zaragoza and Levante supposed to do anything OTHER than go into bankruptcy, relegation, or both? They have small matchday takings, they have small commercial takings, they get virtually nothing from TV rights. What is the incentive for them to manage their affairs reasonably, especially knowing the bankruptcy law will protect them in the end?

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 7, 2011 12:30 AM CEST reply actions  

Again

I stress that I do not want to bury the other 18 clubs in La Liga. But someone has to defend the “Big Two” and I must ask. What exactly do you propose? I’m not saying draft up a huge document, but what sort of figures are we looking at per team, and what figures would RM and Barca get?

Perhaps this will enable me to change my mind, as at the moment, I am thinking that this new TV deal will wipe £100 million from both RM and Barca, and that would be catastrophic for them.

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 7, 2011 9:23 AM CEST reply actions  

A new TV deal,

by my understanding, would take some money from Madrid and Barcelona, but not 100m pounds. Read Fernando Roig’s interview, transcribed by Ravi at Forza Football (and linked on our main page). It would still be a tiered system, based on performance – clearly, Madrid and Barcelona would get the majority of the revenue. But the other teams would see an increase from where they are now, probably about 5m euros at the low end, and up to 10 to 20 mil at the high end. I would expect that Madrid and Barca would be dropped to a total of between 100 and 110 (based on the size of hte pool to go around – although this could change, and definitely even increase, with a new contract, if it was structured appropriately), while the remainder of the clubs would see a change based on their performance.

villarrealusa.com - Endavant Villarreal!

by maddi on Sep 7, 2011 12:45 PM CEST up reply actions  

In that case

Go for it. I see no reason why anyone would disagree with that, and have a problem with it. I take back what I have said, though the point remains that the broadcasters have no money. At 100 million per season, Barca and Real would still operate on the same level, and the league would get better. Apologies for being so ignorant on this issue :)

Senior Editor on Barca Blaugranes.

If you really want you can follow my random musings on Twitter @aduckling_10

"I’m normally not a praying man, but if you’re up there, please save me, Superman."

by Arron Duckling on Sep 7, 2011 5:05 PM CEST up reply actions  

here is what Del Nido is apparently proposing

assuming €900m Euros in the pot, which seems to be the amount they think the TV contract can bring:

360m gets divided equally (18 mil per club);
of the remaining 540m,
180m divided according to team’s performance (final standing)
180m divided according to attendance
180m divided according to “popularity of the club” (I assume this would be marketing sales and the like)

no detail on this, but my guess would be it would affect Barca (for instance) something like this:

Barca: 18m fixed,
            league winner (say 15% of 180), 27m
            attendance (20%?) 36m
            popularity (25%?) 45m
total of 124m. Not so bad compared to now. And that’s probably selling them short on popularity and attendance moneys.

Villarreal: 18m fixed, 4th in league (say 8%), 14m, attendance (5%?) 9m, popularity (5%?), 9m, total 50m compared to 30m now.

team at the bottom: guaranteed 18m flat, plus guaranteed 1 to 2% of the others, so probably gets around 22-25m in total. Far better than now.

Obviously if the contract doesn’t bring in 900m, the numbers look worse for everyone, but in theory the big 2 could lose very little while the “middle class” gains a valuable amount to help them survive

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 7, 2011 6:42 PM CEST reply actions  

Do Barca really contribute 20% of the total attendance of the league?

I realize they have a huge stadium, but that still seems pretty high

by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 8, 2011 5:17 PM CEST up reply actions  

no. see below

it’s 13.75%.

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 8, 2011 6:50 PM CEST up reply actions  

latest from Liga Justa

the mediapro guys are attacking Del Nido/Roig (Del Nido especially)

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 7, 2011 8:51 PM CEST reply actions  

Sevilla blog (in English) well worth a read

here and for the comments as well. Where’s Jiwonsi when we need him?

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 7, 2011 8:54 PM CEST reply actions  

a correction to my earlier post, now that I have attendance figures for La Liga last year

Barcelona had 2.75 times the average attendance in La Liga, so they would get 2.75*(5%)=13.76% of the attendance pool, some 11m lower than I said earlier.
  (A team with the average attendance would get 1/20th, or 5% of the pool, so comparing a team’s attendance per game to the league average is an easy way to avoid having to add all those attendances)

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 7, 2011 9:06 PM CEST reply actions  

Well, Valencia President Manuel Llorente is attending the meeting as a "listener"...

The scuttlebutt is that he won’t support any formula that reduces Valencia’s annual income of €48 million a year. Llorente made a good point about the mess a few weeks ago- seems that Barcelona and Real Madrid get a lot more coverage from the Spanish media than the the others, and the lack of exposure keeps interest in the smaller clubs low and thus weakens their negotiating position when it comes to TV and sponsorship deals. His specific complaint was that the Spanish media only mention Valencia CF when they have bad news to report.

by Jiwonsi on Sep 7, 2011 10:41 PM CEST reply actions  

Jiwonsi!! Ask and he appears!! Seriously, thanks for your comment.

On the Sevilla site there was some slanging at Llorente, justified in some degree since Valencia signed up to forever be enshrined in 3rd position in the TV money, but not justified in other ways. I think what a lot of fans outside Spain are missing is that several events have occurred which pretty much put things at a possible “tipping point”.
  There is of course the dominance of the big two, but even more than that the realization that the continual clasicós are doing more harm to Spanish football in many ways than good. But perhaps most of all, the economic disaster which shows no sign of being solved soon.

   I can totally understand Llorente not wanting to give up €48m given Valencia’s financial situation. I can also understand his frustration, since the club has sold Villa, Silva, and Mata, and yet are still in the same position they were before—-in other words, they HAVE to finish in the top four. A year without CL money would be a disaster. It must feel like you’re running in place and not getting anywhere, especially since the property market is so bad it will be impossible to resolve the stadium issue anytime soon.
 
   Using the Del Nido formula and assuming the pie of €900m (which to my mind may be the biggest question of all), Valencia would get €18m flat; let’s say they came in 3rd again and picked up 10% of that pot, so €18m; €12.85m from the pot divided according to attendance. That’s €49m, and add to that the popularity bit (I have no idea what that would be, but probably €12-18m) and it looks like Valencia would do much better with this formula than €48m.
  However, it’s not guaranteed. A bad couple of seasons in the league table and attendance decline could make a difference. Anyway, I’m pleased that Valencia and Atleti are at least attending as observers.

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 8, 2011 3:00 AM CEST reply actions  

the meeting has begun

Marca is covering it (sort of, making snide comments on the side): Sr. Roig arrived with Sr. Llorente of Valencia. Everyone who had indicated they would attend is there. Mallorca, Levante, Sporting, Getafe and Sociedad not.

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 8, 2011 1:45 PM CEST reply actions  

more meetings planned, desire to have Segunda clubs attend as well

reported by our friends at Managing Madrid and here is some English translation of Sr. Roig’s comments as well as Sr. Del Nido’s press conference

Endavant Villarreal!!

by Allen Dodson on Sep 8, 2011 7:03 PM CEST reply actions  

great article and debate

I missed this yesterday great piece and great debate. I hope today is the beginning of something very important.
I never that US Immigration would come in way of my football team in distant Vila-real. Cant wait for saturday.

Els nostres amors son el blau i el groc
Els nostres amors pel villarreal

by aupasubmarino on Sep 8, 2011 11:26 PM CEST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Endavant, a triomfar, a guanyar Villarreal!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Img_0798_small
Sr. Roig: Malaga still owes money
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 38
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 37
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 20
Maddi_small
Villarreal Players' Average Salary
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 36
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 35
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 34
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 33
Small
La Liga Open Thread: Jornada 32

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Twitter & Facebook

Follow VillarrealUSA on Twitter

Villarreal A & B Fixtures

Villarreal USA podcasts


Managers

Img_0798_small Allen Dodson

Small siempre_riquelme

Maddi_small maddi

N_villarreal_cf_fondos-198463_small aupasubmarino