Result: Villarreal 1-1 Valencia
One of the club's biggest matches of the year will be played tomorrow on the pitch at El Madrigal, a must win for Villarreal as they welcome neighbors and direct rivals Valencia. The match has developed a real derby feel over the last few years as Villarreal CF has established itself as a top-tier team, and the matches tend to get heated. A big change this year is that one of the guys we all loved to hate when these two met up, Carlos Marchena, traded shirts permanently (something no one would ever do with him after a match between these two!). Marchena's presence in yellow should only increase the intensity of this rivalry.
VIllarreal have had the better part of the rivalry over the last few years, going 4-1-2 (with one particularly terrible loss under Valverde's leadership) and winning the last three matches between the clubs at home. by a combined 8-1 scoreline. Add to that, Villarreal have won 12 of 13 home matches since Garrido took control, and you have to think that Villarreal have the edge in the match. Of course, having the edge ahead of the first whistle means absolutely nothing.
The matchup should gain an extra spark this season, as two teams that don't like each other have been given the gift of two extra matches to face off - the clubs will meet up in December and January in the Round of 16 of the Copa del Rey.
Valencia are hurting coming in to the match. They started the season with flare, and took 16 out of their first available 18 points. And then they ran into the same wall we collided with last week - Barcelona. Barcelona only took them out by a single goal, winning 2-1, but that match has made a huge difference in Valencia's season. Beginning with the Barca match, Valencia lost three and drew one before finally being able to pick up three points last week in a home match versus Getafe. They will be looking to add to that victory, knowing that a win against Villarreal could make all of their woes disappear and put them back into a tie for third.
Part of their stumble over the last few weeks has come through injury, and this week is no different. The big-city boys are without Cesar, Juan Mata, Mehmet Topal, Jeremy Mathieu, Manuel Fernandes, and Jordi Alba due to injury. Add to that, David Albelda will miss the match due to a suspension.
The good guys have a nearly-full squad for the match, which should allow for a traditional starting eleven:
Keepers: Diego López and Juan Carlos.
Defenders: Ángel, Gonzalo, Marchena, Musacchio, Capdevila and Catalá.
Midfielders: Bruno, Borja Valero, Senna, Matilla, Cazorla and Cani.
Forwards: Rossi, Nilmar, Marco Ruben and Altidore.
Senna should regain his starting role next to Bruno, with Cazorla and Valero on the wings. Luckily Nilmar did not have to go to the Brazil-Argentina match, so he should be rested. The real question mark in the starting lineup will be Capdevila - not whether or not he will start, because of course he will, he's Capdevila - but how effective he can be as the match stretches towards 90 minutes, and whether or not he can actually make it to the final whistle. He played a very difficult match against Portugal midweek, and is surely suffering for it.
The one personnel loss we have for the match is Jefferson Montero, who could have been a valuable spark off the bench. No injury concerns, but it is a long flight back from South America!
As mentioned earlier in the week, Sidarth, me, and a few others will be joining up at Babylon Futbol Cafe in Arlington, Virginia, just outside of DC tomorrow morning.
And, as you get ready to watch the match, be sure and check out Sidarth's great, great interview over at Forza Football. Sidarth, thanks for spreading the word about Villarreal, and incredible job in the interview!
Prediction: We play them well at home. 3-1. ENDAVANT!
79 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice interview, Sid, and I’ll be happy if maddi’s predicted scoreline is as good. El Madrigal should be full, and Garrido will have his boys ready to roll.
For those unable to watch tomorrow (like me, sadly), espn3 will have it available to watch later.
I’ll go for 3-1 to the Submarine as well, goals by Nilmar, Rossi, and Cazorla. ENDAVANT VILLARREAL!!
by Allen on Nov 20, 2010 4:44 AM CET reply actions
Biggest match of the year, in my book. Must-win to be in the Champions League next season. I foresee a very hard-fought match and would be happy with 3 points any way we can get it. 2-1 to Villarreal with a late winner.
Thanks for the praise, maddi. Can you put up the link to ForzaFutbol on the banner, along with this year’s squad previews? See you tomorrow.
by sidarth on Nov 20, 2010 5:44 AM CET reply actions
Next time Senna is NA, Garrdo should go w/Diamond 442 and Keep Valero in wings
Valero_Cani_Cazorla
______Bruno______
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 8:07 AM CET reply actions
It’s live on ESPN3 @ 12est/9pst
So ESPN bought rights to some liga games, just to stick them all on ESPN3?
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 8:13 AM CET reply actions
Gonzalo linked away…and valued at 9m euros?
I would have believed this a year and a half ago, before last season got underway. But it seems a little nuts right now. I could see a situation if Garrido really valued Catala that he could let him go, and perhaps we could get 3m for him. But it still seems crazy.
by maddi on Nov 20, 2010 3:34 PM CET reply actions
Interview with Bruno in El País. “We know that we’re good”
http://www.elpais.com/articulo/deportes/Sabemos/somos/buenos/elpepidep/20101120elpepidep_4/Tes
by Kenez on Nov 20, 2010 5:02 PM CET reply actions
We have dominated the opening 20 mins, no real chances though!
by Nick on Nov 20, 2010 6:20 PM CET reply actions
and then Aduriz gets a lucky goal! ‘expletives’
by Nick on Nov 20, 2010 6:22 PM CET up reply actions
Villarreal 0-1
Own Goal.
Midfield playing terrible.
Once again Cani playing more in the middle istead of wings
Only players who were playing well are Rossi, Valero and Nilmar, the rest thing they are on a vacy
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 6:23 PM CET reply actions
Congrats to Marchena for scoring for his team :P
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 6:25 PM CET reply actions
It was Gonzalo who chested it in. I thought it might have gone wide without that touch. Very poor defending, regardless.
by sidarth on Nov 20, 2010 11:02 PM CET up reply actions
Good chance for Capdevila on Right foot, saved by moya
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 6:37 PM CET reply actions
Cani, Especially Valero and Cazorla need to step it up
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 6:37 PM CET reply actions
That was not a offisde
Great pass from Rossi to Capdevila for a goal
WHERE WAS THE OFFISDE?
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 6:44 PM CET reply actions
Capdevila was offside by half a body-length. And the 9 yellows and 1 red against Valencia balanced out the calls, regardless.
by sidarth on Nov 20, 2010 11:20 PM CET up reply actions
My Error, Valencia goal was off Gonzalo not Marchena !
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 6:49 PM CET reply actions
Cani has had a couple of good shots which is more than Nilmar and Rossi.
by Kenez on Nov 20, 2010 7:01 PM CET up reply actions
Cani was a hot topic of discussion at our gathering as well. Look for a post on him mid-week. For my money, Cani was our best player, aside from the left back duo of Capdevila (most dangerous attacking threat) and then Bruno (assist on Rossi’s goal).
by sidarth on Nov 20, 2010 11:21 PM CET up reply actions
Need the left wing to open up, I would put Valero there and add Senna in teh middle
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 6:57 PM CET reply actions
Valero yellow, misses the next game
SUB NEEDED SENOR GARRIDO
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 7:07 PM CET reply actions
PK not given, Rossi brought dow, , handle pulled him down
Ruben in for Capdevila
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 7:20 PM CET reply actions
After playing good for 25", Valero had STINKER #2
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 7:29 PM CET reply actions
GOAAAAAAAAAALllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
1-1
Bruno to Rossi for ZZZ goal
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 7:31 PM CET reply actions
1-1
I have to say Valero in the middle is failing. He didn’t step for the 2nd game in row.
Matilla or Senna should have started.
Should have won, but w/ way things were going 1-1 is good result.
Bruno sure can play as LB, (Pellergini taught him well)
Not many chances created by Villarreal, but 1 good chance = 1 goal
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 7:55 PM CET reply actions
The refs once again are messy craps, all offsides of Villarreal in this game are not offsides at all.
btw, I bet the team needs fortress 30m outside, that will give us more space around the penalty area at the opposite side
by Garry on Nov 20, 2010 7:59 PM CET reply actions
I think ref clearly denied the PK today
REF worked hard to make sure of BS offside calls, like the one on Rossi pas to Capdevila and atleast 1 Pk
BUT
Villarreal Midfield lacked BIT.
VALERO went MIA in the middle, may be it’s not his position
Cani gets the conract renewal for his grit performance today, hey atleast he tried,
Looking forward to Senor Allen’s take !
by Aqufina on Nov 20, 2010 8:08 PM CET up reply actions
i’ll have to give it to you tomorrow after i see the replay on espn3. I hadn’t expected to be able to be online at all today and couldn’t catch the match, but from the comments it’s disappointing not to get 3 points today though. sounds like we were flat which is strange given it’s a derby match.
what’s with Garrido not shaking hands with Emery? Anything to do with the TV contract spat, or something else? i’m fine with being disappointed when we don’t win but vcf prides itself on sportsmanship, we are not real madrid
by Allen on Nov 20, 2010 8:47 PM CET up reply actions
Villarreal were clearly superior but Valencia were concerned about the pace of Nilmar and Rossi came out with three at the back and a five man midfield to try stop Villarreal playing. Shows a lack of ambition from a team that supposedly aims to be in the CL.
Once again the referee got the big decisions wrong.
by Kenez on Nov 20, 2010 8:28 PM CET reply actions
Good recap there Kenez,
But as I said earlier afer 20" Valero DISAPPEARED , Cani did o.k, but he plays more in middle.
So maybe Valero should have been in the wings and Cani in middle.
THE REF SUCKED.
Finally got some late breakfast , after the game.
Isn’t great when restuaranst serve Breakfast 24/7 LOL
by Aquafina on Nov 20, 2010 10:04 PM CET up reply actions
Garrido turns his back on Emery at the end of the game. Strange this as last week Guardiola would not shake hands with Garrido.
http://www.as.com/futbol/articulo/garrido-le-niega-mano-unai/20101120dasdasftb_46/Tes
by Kenez on Nov 20, 2010 8:33 PM CET reply actions
We didn’t deserve all 3 points, based on our play in the midfield. Very negative football from Valencia in general, kind of like what a mid-level EPL team would do at Old Trafford or Stamford Bridge. But we should expect that kind of treatment and find ways to work around it. Credit Valencia for an away point with an injury-ravaged squad.
Poor defending on Valencia’s goal (practically their only dangerous chance of the match), which allowed them to sit back and soak up pressure for 70 minutes. Not enough clear-cut chances for us due to a lack of width. This was a game for Montero if I’ve seen one.
by sidarth on Nov 20, 2010 11:12 PM CET reply actions
And in reading the match recaps, poor sportsmanship from Garrido. As people were saying at the end of last season, maybe the power has gone to his head. I think Valencia is our biggest rival, but to be honest, they are generally a class act.
On the refs, they committed many fouls, sure, but the disparity was a bit over the top. We received pretty fortunate officiating, in my opinion, and especially in comparison to last season. But we were effectively playing against 10 for most of the second half and still couldn’t find a way to break through, as Aduriz was out on an island up front.
by sidarth on Nov 20, 2010 11:15 PM CET reply actions
@ Sid
Oh Please, the ref did have a influence in the game.
Yes last year Villarreal were treated bad by the USELESS Liga refs, that doesn’t mean now
the refs should give some calls and not others, and the Villarreal fans should be happy
Too bad for Spain it’s soccer/football is good but the REFS ARE GARABAGE and decide too many games.
That doesn’t hide the fact: Garrido got outsmarted today (In experience showed)
-> Show me where there is offisde here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYR9gAzwnGI
by Aquafina on Nov 21, 2010 1:31 AM CET reply actions
Bruno , I was impressed with him as LB, he played well there.
Maybe he should play in Left wing once Capdevila is back. looks like Villarreal have good LB/W waiting in the wings
by Aquafina on Nov 21, 2010 1:33 AM CET reply actions
I still don’t get it why Villarreal start slow and are still don’t do well in counters by other tEAMS
0-1
bad defending here, and A bit unlucky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh2pZ9eIYIo
by Aquafina on Nov 21, 2010 1:37 AM CET reply actions
sidarth says:
11/20/2010 at 17:15
And in reading the match recaps, poor sportsmanship from Garrido. As people were saying at the end of last season, maybe the power has gone to his head.
I think Valencia is our biggest rival, but to be honest, they are generally a class act.
Were a Class Act, No More lol
Presidente y expresidente del Valencia tuvieron un enfrentamiento en palco
http://www.elperiodicomediterraneo.com/noticias/noticia.asp?pkid=614929
1. Allen says:
what’s with Garrido not shaking hands with Emery? Anything to do with the TV contract spat, or something else?
May have somthing to do with this
Presidente y expresidente del Valencia tuvieron un enfrentamiento en palco
by Aquafina on Nov 21, 2010 3:58 AM CET reply actions
I have only seen the goals and the Capdevila “offside”, but here are a couple of comments.
(1) the goal is in many ways a carbon copy of others we’ve given up. Why is it that as our defense retreats you see them looking around almost as if they have predetermined positions they’re taking up, but they don’t react to either the winger making the cross (we never seem to block these sorts of crosses) or the striker coming into the box. Capdevila and Gonzalo are both in the box, Aduriz splits them. yes, it was an unlucky goal—Capdevila’s attempted clearance went right to Aduriz—but so what.
(2) the offside: yet again the attacker and last man were even (in fact, if you look at Capdevila’s feet, they are farther from the goal than the defender’s) but because of the body lean of the two players it LOOKS as though the attacker is ahead. We benefited from a call like this against Levante—was it?
The offside rule, as written, is confusing, but it seems to me that the league (or even FIFA, since this came up at the WC as well) could surely issue a “rule interpretation” clarifying these sorts of situations to give the benefit to the attacker. Maybe they have, but in all leagues, not just La Liga, too often these sorts of situations get whistled back.
(3) Rossi’s goal was beautiful. More later.
by Allen on Nov 21, 2010 3:34 PM CET reply actions
As regards (2) FIFA say the following in their 2010/11 edition. In the context of Law 11 – Offside, the following definition applies:
"nearer to his opponents’ goal line" means that any part of a player’s head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent. The arms are not included in this definition.
At one time people used to talk about giving the benefit of the doubt to the attacker and clear daylight between attacker and defender but FIFA appear to have gone back on this.
by Kenez on Nov 21, 2010 4:07 PM CET up reply actions
If you look at the clip Aquafina sent, stop it at 0:28. The pass has not yet been made (it’s about to be); Capdevila’s shoulders are beyond the defender. According to the rule as Kenez has quoted it, yes, it is offside. If we went back to the old “daylight” interpretation of the rule, no, he probably would be OK.
It’s ironic that every year or two, especially in international tournaments, FIFA talks about the desire to see more goals scored, yet in their opposition to goal-line technology to actually award goals when they are scored, and their interpretation of the offside rule, they are achieving the opposite.
by Allen on Nov 21, 2010 5:48 PM CET up reply actions
Half time CÓRDOBA 0-0 VILLARREAL B
Córdoba reduced to 10 men shortly before half time. Direct red card to Charles.
by Kenez on Nov 21, 2010 5:54 PM CET reply actions
0-0, 71’. Facundo Coria sent off for his second yellow, so 10v10. Not a good return to the lineup for him.
by sidarth on Nov 21, 2010 6:38 PM CET reply actions
FT 0-0. A goal would’ve lifted the B team into a tie for 7th, but it was not to be. Disappointing after being a man up for 30+ minutes, but a point away from home is OK.
by sidarth on Nov 21, 2010 6:53 PM CET reply actions
Full time CÓRDOBA 0-0 VILLARREAL B
Villarreal B also reduced to ten in the final minutes. Who it was not known at the moment.
by Kenez on Nov 21, 2010 6:55 PM CET reply actions
B team hosts bottom-of-the-table Tenerife next, then play Nastic in Tarragona. We need to win both of those. I’m still not convinced by Gracia, but at least we have two clean sheets in a row.
by Allen on Nov 21, 2010 6:57 PM CET reply actions
O.k so the Rossi pass to Capdevila was offside per fifa interpretation of the offside rule for 10/11
Fifa (<- Rolleyes fifa is full of BS) keep changing the interpretation
2 Offisdes calls:
1) per the new FIFA interpretation Rossi pass to capdevila was offide, since his head is ahead of teh defender
20 However, then the ref inccorrectly called Bruno offside in last few minutes since Bruno was in level w/Defender
by Aquafina on Nov 21, 2010 7:08 PM CET reply actions
2 more tough matches(VS Seville away and VS RM at home) to guarantee our 3rd position at the 1st half season.
btw, good news that Seville lost to Mallorca at home
by Garry on Nov 22, 2010 4:48 AM CET reply actions
OK, now I have seen the replay of the Valencia match I have some comments; mostly I agree with you guys. And I am sorry this post is so long!
Even knowing how the match played out, it was interesting to watch. Emery’s tactics were very good—not only did he pack the defense in the 5-4-1, but he also pressed high up the pitch. Especially the first 10-15 mins Villarreal couldn’t move the ball out of their own half before losing possession. When we did mount attacks, we looked potentially dangerous, particularly w/Capdevila going forward, and Cani as well. Valencia’s goal was lucky, yes, but they were the somewhat better team for the first 40 minutes or so. Interestingly the Capdevila goal disallowed for offside (and/or the Navarro injury) marked a turning point—the last 5 minutes of the first half we played far better, and that carried on into the second half.
I give credit to Garrido for the Ruben substitution—not what I would have expected. By moving Bruno to LB not only did he bring in someone who would continue to attack down that side, but suddenly by putting Ruben in as a third attacker he gave Nilmar and Rossi—especially Nilmar—room to operate, where up until then there had been little. Immediately Nilmar had chances, and he and Rossi could feed each other. And suddenly Rossi had some space too; up until then he had been trying to do too much, beating one guy only to find two more defending him.
However, after the Rossi goal I have no idea what happened. Passes went astray, midfield was weak (actually, I thought the period from our goal until the sending off was the worst we played all game), and even a man up we put no pressure on the ball. We created some half-chances, but even at the end, in injury time, we nearly allowed an attack to create a last-gasp goal. Just ridiculous.
specific players:
GK: Lopez not at fault for goal, in general OK. Not sure he always picked out the best option to try to move the ball upfield against pressure.
Back 4: I gather Mussachio was a late scratch; Gonzalo was pretty bad in the first half, played a bit better afterwards, had one good tackle as I recall. Marchena was great for me—I counted 3 or 4 times when he made key interceptions/clearances/tackles to deny clear shots on goal. Capdevila until injured was a great attacking force, Angel was decent. I expect we will lose Capdevila for a while if his ankle injury is as bad as it looked.
Midfield: Cani was probably the best of the group today, I didn’t think Borja was as bad as Aquafina and some others did, but he didn’t have a great game either. Neither one of his first-half falls in the penalty area were worth a penalty for me, btw. Santi was OK but again not his best, I’m sure he’s black and blue from Banega’s persistent fouls. Bruno likewise OK but not his best. Senna was in the game when we equalized, yes, but he didn’t really do much positive while he was in there that I saw.
1st half especially we didn’t really figure out how to play against the formation Valencia threw at us. They succeeded in breaking up play and we never got any space for the sort of diagonal passes Borja and Santi are so good at. Cani made some good runs and had a couple of shots narrowly off-target, beating the keeper from one of them, but Capdevila read the game better than our midfield did—he offered attacking options the midfield didn’t.
Attackers: Little linkup between Nilmar and Rossi- Valencia effectively took it away. Even so, Rossi scored a goal, had a decent chance for another, a half-shout at a penalty as well (could have been given, but would have been controversial had it been). Ruben’s introduction and tactical change helped things but his falling down in the penalty area in injury time was silly and really called for a yellow card I thought.
Referee: borderline offside went against us, possible penalty appeal turned down, but I can’t feel strongly about either one. We were guilty of playing too much for yellows though, and I think the ref, and probably most observers, felt we were falling too easily in the penalty area to award anything. Aquafina is right about the Bruno offside in added time—it wasn’t.
Coach: Garrido fell victim to Emery’s experience and crafty game plan, but I thought his change of formation in the second half gave us the opportunity to come back and earn a point. Senna for Valero was to avoid a second yellow I think, plus Borja had taken some hard fouls. I expect we would’ve seen Montero had he been available. Even w/Valencia’s excellent play we could have scored a second goal in the last 5 minutes plus injury time—we just couldn’t quite get the breaks or connect the passes.
I don’t blame Emery for setting out to not lose. I am sure he figured with their injuries he would likely lose an open, flowing game, and with the current standings and the importance of the CL moneys he could not afford to drop this match. We may well see other teams try this approach at El Madrigal, and Garrido needs to plan for it.
I don’t know why, having had success pressuring the ball against Athletic and fighting hard in the first half for possession, at least, against Barca, we were so passive today. I didn’t think it was specifically “midfield that lacked bite”; it was our game plan, or execution, that lacked bite, and also patience. We didn’t play through challenges, preferring to try to get the easy free kick; we didn’t challenge them for possession in their half enough—when we did, they gave the ball away cheaply sometimes.
As for the non-handshake at the end, well Garrido certainly never looked toward Emery—he was already well onto the pitch when Emery came out along the touchline, hand outstretched. Garrido didn’t snub him directly by refusing to shake hands,but he did so indirectly. He’s since said he didn’t mean anything by it, he and Emery are still friends, etc. but I hope before the Copa match in the Mestalla something is done to lay this controversy, such as it may be, to rest. We don’t need it.
Hopefully the Capdevila injury is not too bad. I guess we lose Borja for the next match, too.
by Allen on Nov 22, 2010 5:42 AM CET reply actions
Capdevila -> seen walkning around. Likely a bad sprain, may be rested for the next match
Bruno / Nilmar -> Carring knocks (nothing serious) only worked out in GYM
Garrido: Should learn from Valencia match, and make adjustements quicker in tactics
during the match when faced w/Emery like tactical situation
Ruben: Did help open the space for Rossi and Nilmar, where exactly did he play?
Behind them in Diamond 442 ? or as LW. I couldn’t figure it out
by Aquafina on Nov 22, 2010 6:14 AM CET reply actions
I watched some of the last half hour again—I apologise to Rossi, should have been a penalty around 60’—he beat the defender who pulled him down, grabbing his sleeve. Ref had a good view, didn’t give it, I would have; not as soft as I first thought.
Second, Ruben: neither diamond nor LW; he was basically the center guy in a 4-3-3. As soon as he came in he occupied the central defenders, Nilmar moved out to RW and found space there. The three of them overlapped a lot, but Ruben was mostly in the center, sometimes left of center. However, when the ball was cleared and Villarreal tracked back, Nilmar and Rossi stayed up, Ruben dropped back toward the centre circle before moving forward again. In fact if you look at the buildup to our goal, as well as the attack just prior to it, they are very similar—Angel, Senna, Ruben play short balls in the center of the pitch, out to Bruno on LW who then plays ball forward to the strikers. I think Garrido was taking advantage of his fresh legs as well as his goal-poaching ability.
Also, apologies to Ruben—he didn’t dive, what happened was he and the defender got their legs tangled—they both fell. No penalty, but no yellow card either.
Will be interesting to see how Garrido prepares for Zaragoza. Capdevila surely won’t play, Borja Valero is suspended, and I am not sure Senna is really fit. If Senna is OK to go, Bruno to LB, Mussachio as a holding midfielder, and Cani (or Montero) on LW? If Senna isn’t OK, I think Bruno has got to shore up center midfield, so Oriol gets a start at LB.
It’s a team we should beat, but they will have the “new coach” bounce and we have got to take it to them.We can’t stroll around like we did against Levante.
by Allen on Nov 22, 2010 3:15 PM CET up reply actions
Garrido so far has relied on five midfielders, with Borja suspended he can’t really afford to move Bruno to left back. So the starting midfield is likely to be Senna, Bruno, Cazorla and Cani, with Matilla and Montero available to come off the bench. Therefore Joan Oriol has to start at left back
by Kenez on Nov 22, 2010 4:17 PM CET up reply actions
da bruno played well as lb. i put in matilla in mid & leave da bruno as lb
by jackson on Nov 22, 2010 5:41 PM CET up reply actions
Looks like Garrido goes with Kenez, sorry maddi and jackson:
http://www.redmediterraneo.com/vila-real/noticias/noticia.asp?pkid=13295
by Allen on Nov 24, 2010 1:18 PM CET up reply actions
Capdevila could be out for two to three weeks.
http://www.elperiodicomediterraneo.com/noticias/noticia.asp?pkid=615476
by Kenez on Nov 22, 2010 4:56 PM CET up reply actions
Allen,
You are right I watched the 2nd half again, and Senna did NADA when he came on, looks like he’s off form/not really fit.
by Aquafina on Nov 22, 2010 6:15 AM CET reply actions
Facundo Coria, replaced Hernan Perez in 71st minute and lasted only nine minutes after collecting two yellow cards. Match report here:
http://www.marca.com/2010/11/21/futbol/2adivision/1290368285.html
by Kenez on Nov 22, 2010 10:36 AM CET reply actions
Allen says:
11/22/2010 at 09:15
I watched some of the last half hour again–I apologise to Rossi, should have been a penalty around 60?–he beat the defender who pulled him down, grabbing his sleeve. Ref had a good view, didn’t give it, I would have; not as soft as I first thought.
da allen,
tat is a clear pk , unless of course u r a liga ref who prefer big clubs
d g.rossi is turning & is pulled down, (by hand pull),
but da ruben went swimming. 4 me da ref missed clear 1 offisde & 1clear pk 4 da vcf
sad but true da liga refs r not good
also,
da facts r da facts
da vcf missed a chance 2 win, should win a match like this, where valencia had many injuries.
4 me da midfield needs 2 deal w/high pressure & 451 type of match or it will be tough season
by jackson on Nov 22, 2010 5:38 PM CET reply actions
yes, clear pk. when i watched it ‘live’ i didn’t see how significant the contact was—but a professional ref standing right by it, as there was, should have seen it and given the pk. even so we should have won this match.
depor played sort of like this against us at El Madrigal too. the difference was their players werent as good or as disciplined as los che and they didn’t get a lucky goal early. we have got to get out of the blocks better. we’ve fallen behind in our last 4 la liga matches and 7 of 12. levante is the only team that scored against us after we had a lead, i believe
by Allen on Nov 22, 2010 7:43 PM CET up reply actions
Zonal marking on the match
Lack of width and 3 Central defenders was the probelm in the first half
The two wing-backs were charged with taking care of the interiores, and here it was notable that Miguel did quite well up against Cani – Cani always came inside,
Miguel was able to tackle on his stronger side. He and Bruno played very narrow.
This is why when Cani plays, Garrido should play Valero on the Left.
by Aqua-fina on Nov 23, 2010 7:23 AM CET reply actions
Am I in need of more morning coffee, or does the zonalmarking article have the midfield flip-flopped?
by Allen on Nov 23, 2010 1:45 PM CET reply actions
Villarreal-Sevilla 19.00 hours Sunday 5th December.
by Kenez on Nov 23, 2010 8:09 PM CET reply actions
according 2 da ser, da vcf is interested in cavani 2 replace nilmar or g.rossi this summer.
i doubt he will be cheap as he doing very well w/napoli
by jackson on Nov 23, 2010 8:18 PM CET reply actions
Borja on wing or middle: I think it depends on who plays LB and how their role is defined. Cani pinches in often because Capdevila makes so many strong runs down the left wing. (When he pinches in even when Capdevila doesn’t go forward our attack becomes narrower and flatter, which is a problem).
Borja’s strength is making the longer passes and having space in which to operate—he’s done that well from the wing, but also from the center. So I see Aquafina’s point, but I’m not sure where he plays is as important as how he plays. He has had some magnificent games, only to follow up with a not-so-good one.
Cavani might be a fun player to have but he will be expensive (he’s under contract w/Palermo until 2014) and he’s of Italian descent, so I kinda think he might not want to leave Italy!
by Allen on Nov 23, 2010 9:49 PM CET up reply actions
story about Villarreal w/Diego Lopez and Senna interviews:
http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/clubfootball/news/newsid=1339641.html
not sure calling Castellon a “southeast province” is entirely accurate, but otherwise it’s pretty good….
by Allen on Nov 24, 2010 12:09 AM CET reply actions
Hard to tell which is worse, English press or Spanish referees.
Earlier this week Joan Capdevila was quoted (in EPM I believe it was) to the effect that his contract renewal talks hadn’t started but he expected them to take about 15 minutes—he wants to stay, and Sr. Roig has already said we intend to resign him.
Today the Daily Mirror reports “Liverpool is on alert as Capdevila talks hit roadblock!” The “roadblock” reported is that Capdevila wants a two year deal and Villarreal policy is to offer a 32 year-old player a one-year deal. Funny, we signed Marchena (31) for three years just this summer.
Perhaps the Mirror is confusing our policy with that of Arsenal; as I recall we signed a 32-year old midfielder to a three-year contract from that very team. Some French dude, did pretty well for us I think….
by Allen on Nov 24, 2010 5:17 AM CET reply actions
Per EPM Villarreal expect to meet with the agent of Capdevila next week in oder to finalise the new contract.
http://www.elperiodicomediterraneo.com/noticias/noticia.asp?pkid=615828
by Kenez on Nov 24, 2010 9:39 AM CET up reply actions
English press = Spanish referees = both are crap
by Acqua @ Snooze mode on Nov 24, 2010 8:32 AM CET reply actions








